Prosperity is
rarely a concept that is collectively agreed upon. More specifically,
prosperity is continuously redefined from one generation to the next. For
instance: while a family without a refrigerator today in America might be
thought of as fairly non-prosperous, not a single household had a refrigerator
or other efficient food preserver three generations ago. One’s evaluation of personal
prosperity might be based on his position relative to his peers. An individual
who has sufficient food, water, and shelter in a developing nation might view
himself as prosperous if he sees several of his peers struggling with
starvation. Because values are subjective, personal prosperity will be
subjective to some degree. A common element in every man’s definition of
prosperity, however, is satisfaction of physiological needs. One who is
prosperous will be required to allocate little of their time to finding ways to
satisfy physiological needs and can refocus attention to pleasure achieved non-physiologically.
A man who is spending less time looking for food and water is a man spending
more time looking for a mate, working toward social advancement, etc. So, to
say that society A is more prosperous than society B, society A must have human
necessities satisfied to a greater degree than society B. Members in Society B
will be forced to spend more time finding ways of satisfying basic needs and
less time satisfying human needs beyond the physiological level.
No comments:
Post a Comment